The New York Times ran a revealing article about how some Arab states are siding with Israel over Hamas.
The piece by David Kirkpatrick,
who is based in Cairo for the paper, was not-so-subtly skewed against Israel.
I hope I am not being unfair, but as I read the tone of the piece, Kirkpatrick is
basically saying – this is not the way it is supposed to be.
And he seems disappointed.
There is a spitball thrown in about Israeli bombings
of UNRWA facilities – as if these are just neutral shelters and not rocket-launching
sites; and as if all the fatalities are attributable to Israel when the Times itself
has reported Hamas's culpability in some cases.
The piece, it strikes me, is also an inferred apology for
Secretary of State John Kerry.
But for all my nitpicking here, I am glad to see this
coverage.
Israel is not isolated and – just as in the case of Iran's drive for nuclear
weapons – Jerusalem is in sync with Egypt and the Gulf States while Washington
is not.
[In fact, on Iran, I'd say that even Ankara is not thrilled.]
Kirkpatrick writes how Israel
has the tacit support of Arab states led by Egypt in its war against Hamas in
Gaza.
Jordan, Saudi Arabia and
the United Arab Emirates have lined up behind Cairo in backing Jerusalem's just military
campaign against the Islamic Resistance Movement also known as Hamas.
The Arab Spring, a populist
uprising which began in 2010 and empowered political Islam – meaning Islamist
forces – unleashed chaos and threatened conservative Arab leaders.
On the whole, the Middle East is worse off today.
The Islamist war in
Tunisia continues.
That's true, too, in Algeria.
Libya is a total mess.
Slowly but surely the Islamists are solidifying their position in Morocco though for now violence
there is minimal.
You can blame the mess in Syria on the Arab Spring too. And as Syria goes so goes the failed state of Lebanon.
Iraq you can't blame on the Arab Spring. But that's a mess too.
###
In contrast to previous
Palestinian-Israeli fighting in Gaza, Arab leaders are not pressuring
Washington to tell Israel to stop.
"That gives the Israelis leeway," Martin Kramer, an expert on Mideast politics and president of Shalem
College in Jerusalem, told Kirkpatrick.
Neither the Cairo-led
coalition nor Israel want to see Hamas come out of the current fighting as the
most "powerful Palestinian player," said Kramer.
I think the same can be said for the Fatah leadership but they are conniving, twisted, and gutless and understandably Kirkpatrick avoided interviewing them.
Though maybe a follow up article is coming. I just find the Fatah folks so hypocritical. Their ineptitude lost them Gaza after Israel handed it to them on a silver platter when we disengaged.
They gave us a taste of what might happen if the "West Bank" were handed over to the boys from Fatah.
Anyway...
Though maybe a follow up article is coming. I just find the Fatah folks so hypocritical. Their ineptitude lost them Gaza after Israel handed it to them on a silver platter when we disengaged.
They gave us a taste of what might happen if the "West Bank" were handed over to the boys from Fatah.
Anyway...
Khaled Elgindy of the
Brookings Institution told Kirkpatrick much the same. "There is clearly a convergence of interests
of these various regimes with Israel."
"The Arab states'
loathing and fear of political Islam is so strong that it outweighs their
allergy to Benjamin Netanyahu," the ubiquitous Aaron David Miller told Kirkpatrick.
Hamas is, of course, the Palestinian
branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.
President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt
overthrew his Muslim Brotherhood predecessor Mohamed Morsi in July 2013.
While
Hosni Mubarak and Morsi led Egypt, Hamas used tunnels between Gaza and the
Sinai Peninsula to smuggle weapons and contraband. Mubarak liked to watch Israelis bleed slowly.
Morsi was greedier.
Under Sisi not only have the
tunnels been sealed but the border crossings have been only intermittently
open.
A storekeeper in
northern Gaza said, "Sisi is worse than Netanyahu, and the Egyptians are
conspiring against us more than the Jews. They finished the Brotherhood in
Egypt, and now they are going after Hamas," according to Kirkpatrick.
In navigating the new
constellation of Mideast alliances, the hapless Kerry has come
under well-deserved criticism for turning to Qatar and Turkey to serve as his intermediaries
with Hamas instead of Egypt.
Doha and Ankara are backers of
Hamas. Qatar not only funds Hamas its Al Jezzera reports on the war. Though in fairness, Al Jezzera is no more or less anti-Zionist than Sky News and Co. which aren't funded out of the Arabian Gulf (as far as we know).
Meanwhile, an Israeli
delegation is now in Cairo and Hamas officials from Qatar are expected to
arrive there later Thursday as Egyptian intelligence officials make another
effort to bring about a cease-fire, Israeli news media has reported.
I don't think the Saudis, Hashemites, or Egyptians harbor secret Zionist sentiments. Like Mahmoud Abbas and the other "moderates" they subscribe to the phased plan for Israel's destruction.
Be that as it may, there has never been a better time to liquidate the Hamas threat. As I said yesterday, you can't take Hamas out of the Palestinian heart, but you can remove the Hamas bone from the Israeli throat.
Never has there been a better time.