A Palestinian Arab newspaper
has reportedly quoted State Department Spokeswoman Jen Psaki as saying the
United States does not necessarily expect Palestinian Arabs to accept that
Israel has a right to exist in the Middle East as the state of the Jewish
people.
Psaki was interviewed
by the Arabic-language Al-Quds newspaper on Saturday.
According to multiple Israeli
press reports, Psaki said, "The American position is clear, Israel is a
Jewish state. However, we do not see a need that both sides recognize this
position as part of the final agreement."
Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu maintains that the Palestinian refusal to recognize the
legitimacy of the return of the Jewish people to Israel is at the core of the
conflict. The rejectionism signals that that even if the more moderate
Palestinian faction signed a peace accord with Israel they would see it as only
a temporary expediency – while adhering to the position that Jews have no right
to a nation state in the Middle East.
Palestinian Authority
leader Mahmoud Abbas, who is based in the West Bank, is scheduled to arrive in
Washington on March 17 for meetings with President Barack Obama and other
administration officials.
His opposition to
accepting the right of a Jewish state in the Middle East is the same as that of
the Palestinian Hamas leadership which governs in Gaza.
Psaki also reportedly said
that a "framework agreement" outlining the future direction of the
negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority has not yet been
finalized.
The current round of talks
began in July 2013 under heavy Obama administration pressure on both sides. The administration pressured Israel to release hundreds of terrorists -- a factor that explains the uptick in security dangers including on Road 443.
The release of the Gilad Schalit prisoners has already caused major damage to security and deterrence.
At any rate, neither side wanted these talks. If nothing else they agreed that talking would be pointless. The Palestinian Arab "minimum" was well beyond anything Israel could accept.
Indeed, forced talks that collapse in failure were likely to de-stabilize the Arab street and lead to dashed hopes and increased violence.
But the administration and the Europeans opted for the illusion of momentum.
The
administration said that it hoped to wrap up a deal by April 2014.
That
now appears, shall we say, unlikely.
As a fallback, the State Department wanted to have the
two sides initial a "framework agreement" that, based on agreed
parameters, would carry the talks past April.
But the two sides can't even agree on that -- certainly not for signature.
Now, according to an
Israel Radio on Friday, the U.S. is trying to come up with wording for a
"framework agreement" that is satisfactory to the sides though neither
Arabs nor Israelis would have to formally endorse it.
By putting the talks between Israel and the PLO on the front burner rather than dealing with Iran, and by simply ignoring that with Hamas in control of Gaza, a deal with the PLO is anyway pointless -- the US has wasted its diplomatic capital.
On the Palestinian conflict with Israel, this administration has managed to get it all wrong.