It’s really dreadful,” she muttered to herself, “the way all the creatures argue. It’s enough to drive one crazy!
Some percentage of these will be ultra-Orthodox non-Zionists (the
Williamsburg, Kiryas Joel, and Borough Bark crowd). Their politics is patronage-based. They vote as a bloc following the guidelines of shtadlanim,
the medieval-like brokers who handle relations with the non-Jewish outside.
Support will also come from the modern (i.e., less insular) Orthodox (YU
and OU worlds) who tend to be socially and politically conservative and take
their cues from Israeli rightist influencers.
I am writing here with a third and smallest group in mind. These include family and my former Zionist-leaning comrades who are convinced that by backing Trump they are putting the Jewish state’s wellbeing foremost.
Many profess to
approve of his policies across the board; several support him grudgingly
and concede he is an odious fellow. All reasonably fret that any Biden-Harris administration would be oriented toward J-Street
or worse.
That Trump is pro-Israel is undeniable. Elsewhere I have argued that Trump’s pro-Israelism does not override the mortal threat he poses to the US political system’s stability. That his impulsive, neo-isolationist, and huckster approach to foreign policy puts Israel in peril over the long-term. I will say more about his latest pro-Israel accomplishment below.
For the moment, I appeal to my pro-Israel friends who remain enamored with Donald Trump or feel they're obliged to support him, to read Bob Woodward’s Rage.
The book is surprisingly fair-minded.
Woodward, for instance, does not gloss over China’s initial stonewalling over Wuhan. Trump’s right decisions are credited and contextualized. The veteran journalist and president watcher received remarkable White House access for his latest book.
What makes Rage required reading are a couple of priceless chapters devoted to the inscrutable not-yet-forty-year-old Jared Kushner, senior advisor and son-in-law to the United States president.
If you can read these chapters and stick with Trump you have fallen down your own rabbit hole.
Kushner, according to Woodward, says that if you want to understand how things in Trump World work there is a required reading list. He considers his wife's father to be brilliant and reveals how he enthralls his core supporters.
The roster begins with Peggy Noonan’s March 10, 2018, Wall Street
Journal column, “Over Trump, We’re Divided as Ever;” Alice in Wonderland,
the 1865 novel by Lewis Carroll; The Gatekeepers: How the White House Chiefs
of Staff Define Every Presidency, by Chris Whipple, and concludes with Win
Bigly: Persuasion in a World Where Facts Don’t Matter by Scott Adams.
I always found Noonan, a former speechwriter for Ronald Reagan, insightful
and levelheaded, and went back to the column Kushner cited.
Writing three years into the Trump presidency, Noonan wondered why some centrists
and moderates refused to get on the Trump bandwagon. She was also curious
about whether the president’s working-class supporters were satisfied with his
performance thus far.
To gauge the latter, she spoke with her Trump-supporting working-class white Catholic sister and uncle. They reported being contented. She thinks she knows why. For too long, the wealthiest and
most powerful Americans had not taken their fiduciary responsibilities
seriously toward people like them. They had not even faked “a prudent interest” in the travails of
working people.
Noonan concedes that in office, Trump established a “deregulatory spirit
that is fair and helpful.” He placed sober conservatives on the federal courts.
At the time of her writing, the economy was humming, so no complaints there.
Yet moderates and centrists who mostly agreed with his policies had not warmed to Trump. They felt
disquiet about “the worrying nature of Mr. Trump himself. You look at his White
House and see what appears to be epic instability, mismanagement and confusion.
You see his resentments and unpredictability,” Noonan wrote in 2018.
At first, the moderates and centrists thought maybe they were blind to
his genius. Yet the chaos he was creating was not strategic in pursuit of any
policy ends, “its purposeless disorder for the fun of it.”
She concluded that Trump is “unhinged” and characterizes his
administration as a “screwball tragedy.”
So why would Kushner direct us to Noonan? It is an odd way to laud your
father-in-law, Woodward comments.
Probably because Kushner would have wanted us to focus on the following
lines from the column: “On some level this is working. And on some level this
is crazy. He’s crazy…and it’s kind of working.”
However, Noonan does not leave it there.
“Then you realize… Crazy doesn’t go the distance. Crazy is an unstable
element that, when let loose in an unstable environment, explodes.”
She wraps up on a prescient note. “Sooner or later something bad will
happen…if the president is the way he is on a good day, what will he be like on
a bad day. It all feels so dangerous. Centrist and moderate supporters are
seeing what Trump supporters cannot, will not see.”
So, I guess what comforts Kushner – and this is lesson number 1 – is that
Trump supporters are in a state of almost metaphysical blindness to his character.
Next on Kushner's list is Alice in Wonderland purportedly a Disney-style madcap children’s adventure
story about a girl who sees a white rabbit dressed in a suit and bowtie sporting
a pocket watch and, out of curiosity, chases him down a rabbit hole into an
alternative reality where she encounters all sorts of anthropomorphic animals.
Never having read the fable as a child, I find the fantasy dark and nasty. The animals Alice encounters are mean and bickering. What happens in Wonderland – or in Kushner’s alternate reality, the White House – is nonsensical.
Rules are arbitrary.
“Have some wine,” the March Hare said in an
encouraging tone. Alice looked all round the table, but there was nothing on it
but tea. “I don’t see any wine,” she remarked. “There isn’t any,” said the
March Hare.
Intimidation pervades the environment. The Queen’s constant refrain is, “I’ll have you executed.”
The Cheshire Cat
warns Alice that everyone she will meet will be mad. Indeed, the animals Alice encounters
urge her to “come on” but there is no destination:
“Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?”
Alice knows a lot about history but not what happened or when.
Lesson number 2: Kushner seems to be saying that Trump
has calculatedly created his own topsy turvy, Wonderland.
Next on the Kushner list is Gatekeepers for which Whipple interviewed 17 former White House chiefs
of staff to pinpoint what it takes to ensure a West Wing that operates effectively
and efficiently.
By recommending this book, Kushner’s counterintuitive lesson number 3 – precisely the opposite of Whipple’s – is that disarray and conflict are excellent; smarty-pants chiefs of staff like Reince Priebus and John Kelly who try to manage the president are tossers.
That brings us to the last item on Kushner’s syllabus, Win Bigly, by Adams. Kushner here seems to endorse Adams’ analysis (and approval) of Donald Trump’s persuasion techniques. Adams is in Kushner’s good graces because the Dilbert cartoon creator predicted Trump would be elected.
To muddy the waters, Adams unconvincingly asserts that
he disapproves of Trump’s policies even if he holds Trump to be the “most persuasive human I have ever
observed.”
For Adams, Trump is persuasive because of his performances. People are fundamentally irrational. They stay mentally afloat thanks to cognitive dissonance, which resolves inconsistencies in their thinking. And Trump reaches voters on an irrational level. He tells them "many people are saying” to introduce some new weird idea. He speaks with childlike simplicity “big, beautiful wall”, which, according to Adams, people can easily relate to and easily remember.
Trump’s muddled syntax is in fact, strategic ambiguity. Trump dazzles his voters with simple solutions to complex problems. Kushner’s lesson number 4, I intuit, from Adams is: Facts are only crucial to the extent that they can be used to manipulate an audience emotionally.
Put the four readings together, and this is what you get: (1) Kushner is gratified
with Trump’s Svengali-like hold on his followers. (2) He thinks the administration
needs no overarching mission. That being organized gets in the way of (3) a journey that has no destination. Furthermore, (4) facts are useful only
insofar as they serve manipulative ends.
My friends in the states who share Kushner’s boundless confidence in Trump, his embrace of the
president’s fluidity, his thrill at watching the master bait his enemies, pushing
them into irrational gutter behavior will stick with Kushner’s cynical vacuous
father-in-law no matter what on November 3.
But I would like to hope that others will come to their senses and reconsider backing Trump notwithstanding the good that Trump has done for Israel
Recognizing the good Hakarat HaTov people have done and showing gratitude is a Jewish tradition.
By crucially facilitating
peaceful relations between Israel and Gulf Arab states, Donald Trump and his
team have done the Jewish state an immeasurable good.
Yet keep the context in mind.
After processing nearly four years of Trump administration performance, the Gulf Arabs and Egypt came to understand that they cannot rely on the US to side with them militarily against Persian Iran.
The Arabs saw how under George W. Bush, the US
overextended itself fighting Islamist forces and did not choose or conduct its battles wisely. They observed Barack Obama’s inclination to disengage militarily from the Middle East with his 2012 decision not to act militarily against the Assad regime after its use of sarin gas.
Trump stumbled and bumbled further along this path in his unscripted call with Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the Islamist leader of Turkey during which he betrayed America's fighting Kurdish allies. And there was his neo-isolationist declaration that America would no longer “police the world” and was “getting out” of the “blood-stained sand” of the Middle East.
The message the president was sending was that he might act militarily only if he perceives American lives in direct danger.
None of this detracts from our gratitude.
Israelis are thankful for Trump’s
recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. For moving the US Embassy to our capital. And to Secretary of State Mike
Pompeo for announcing that the US does not consider Israeli civilian
settlements in the West Bank or Judea and Samaria inconsistent with international law.
We are grateful that the US has
never voted against Israel (or abstained in favor of our enemies) at the UN in
the past four years. That Trump is willing to take on Amnesty International and other groups, that wrap themselves in the halo of human rights, for their bias against Israel.
Thanks, too, to the Trump administration for not publicly criticizing IDF operations.
Unfortunately, because Trump is widely disrespected all these appreciated policies are tarnished, tainted, devalued.
Sometimes the president’s motives and timing are painfully transparent. As when on January 29, 2020, while the US Senate was deciding whether he was guilty of the House impeachment articles, Trump announced his long-touted Israeli-Palestinian Deal of the Century.
It guaranteed the establishment of a Palestinian state, yet the PLO (in Ramallah) and Hamas (in Gaza) rejected the imposed deal. Maybe they figured Trump, Jared Kushner and the team of Jason Greenblatt, David Friedman, and Avi Berkowitz did not have Palestinian interests at heart.
In August 2020, Kushner also brokered an agreement between the UAE and Israel and between Bahrain and Israel.
And on October 23, the
president announced that Sudan and Israel agreed to diplomatic ties.
And if Trump is re-elected, expect
Saudi Arabia to follow (since it has backed all these moves privately).
We thank Trump for backing Binyamin Netanyahu's Palestinian workaround -- ties with the Arab world first.
All these moves provide a huge psychic, political, and diplomatic boost for Israel.
Each is tainted -- sad to say -- because Trump delivered them. And within Israel by Netanyahu's sagging credibility.
Still, it would be beyond churlish not
to say thank you to both leaders.
Like me, most Israelis do not
care if Trump’s heart is in the wrong place. Or if the president is prejudiced (like many of his predecessors). So long as he does the right thing. At any rate, he is undoubtedly
no anti-Semite and American Jews should stop saying he is.
Precisely because Trump is transactional -- thinking first about what’s in it for the Trump’s, the Kushner’s, and for America’s military-industrial complex -- that he, and not his arguably better-intentioned more strategic-minded predecessors, spearheaded these game-changing diplomatic gains for Israel.
Since the president is mercurial he could yet turn against Israel in a final term to close a deal with a new Palestinian leadership. Who knows? "We'll see," as the president likes to say.
Back to now. The reason the
United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Oman, Bahrain, Sudan, and Saudi Arabis have
reached out to Israel – openly or discreetly – is to hedge their bets against
Iran as the United States makes it clear it wants no more foreign military
entanglements. Some of the countries will be rewarded with access to the most advanced US weapons. Others will be taken off the State Department's list of countries supporting terrorism.
Regardless of whether Trump or
Joe Biden wins, the US posture will likely continue to diminish globally. Russia and China will be the main outside powers with influence in our region.
With Trump, the US departure
will happen as a series of unpredictable and mystifying lurches. With Biden,
the withdrawal may be more systematic and coordinated.
Either way, the United States’
diminishing global role – it's pulling inward – represents an immense strategic
challenge for Israel in the years ahead.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I am open to running your criticism if it is not ad hominem. I prefer praise, though.