WHAT IF WE GAVE MANSOUR ABBAS A CHANCE?

On Monday, at Hebrew University, I attended a talk by Dr. Mansour Abbas, the Arab Knesset member who – remarkably – sits in the Zionist government and Knesset while heading the Islamist party RAM. The discussion was smartly moderated by Channel 12 journalist Rina Matzliach and sponsored by the dovish-leaning Truman Institute headed by Prof. Vered Vinisky-Seroussi. Matzliach, who on TV sometimes comes over as a prima donna did not make the event about herself.

Mansour Abbas’s argument, in a nutshell, is that the conflict between Palestinian Arabs and the Zionist enterprise is intractable. We need to live with that and find workarounds to make day-to-day life better for every citizen.

Abbas mentioned the influence the late Rabbi Menachem Froman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menachem_Froman had on him. Rabbi Froman was among the first in the settler movement to articulate the need for coexistence rooted in religious grounds and to reach out to Muslim religious leaders to convince them to embrace the idea of tolerance and coexistence. Now, Abbas works together with the principled and admired Rabbi Michael Melchior https://www.rabbimichaelmelchior.org/welcome a strictly Orthodox Jerusalem rabbi of dovish leanings.

Abbas is an HU alum and expressed his gratitude to the university not only for the opportunity to learn dentistry but for doing so in a Hebrew-speaking environment. He said mastering Hebrew was an essential tool in his campaign to improve conditions for Israel’s Palestinian Arab citizens.

To the crux of the matter. I don’t think the message of coexistence and tolerance is much promulgated by Arab leaders to an Arab audience in Arabic. I am unaware of any coexistence group that is not funded by foreigners. So when a home-grown Arab leader who has street creds comes to promulgate coexistence and tolerance I put my cynicism on hold.

There has never been a reformation in Islam. There are no reform mosques. Muslim civilization does not find it easy to play second fiddle to any other civilization. Hence the partition of India, for example. Palestinian Arab society is socially conservative. Arab leaders tend not to come from the world of the humanities and liberal arts. Indeed, Abbas is, as noted, a dentist. His political nemesis is the crafty, charismatic, and uncompromising gynecologist and Knesset Member Ahmed Tibi.

Parenthetically, beyond the Green Line, Hamas was co-founded by the now-departed pediatrician Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi. One of its current leaders, Khaled Mashal, studied physics. Granted, Yehiya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh were educated more as Arabists, but I doubt in any liberal arts sense.

The Arab educational emphasis is practical. Naturally, there are social workers and teachers. However, pedagogically, the best and the brightest students tend to gravitate to the hard sciences. These are useful professions but don’t offer much space to inculcate the message of tolerance. The Palestinian Arabs we Israelis generally encounter are on the one hand pharmacists, doctors, nurses, and on the other construction workers, and unskilled laborers.

Something tells me most imams are not preaching acceptance of the other from the minbar.

Thus, having Mansour Abbas preach tolerance – not of the vacuous Kumbaya “why-can’t-we-all-get-along" sort – but a pragmatic self-interested broadmindedness legitimized by his authoritative reading of the Koran is hugely valuable.

“I don’t speak in coexistence jargon,” he granted – but I live coexistence, he implied. 

As for the Islamic Sharia Council that his party supposedly answers to – he said it is elected and that there are term limits. This gives his stance for coexistence unique legitimacy. He characterized the Sharia Council of his Islamist stream as a democratic model for religious politics.

His coexistence impulse came early. Abbas told his HU audience that he grew up in a mixed Arab town with Druze and Christians. This was where he learned real-world broadmindedness — which presumably predisposed him to embrace Froman’s line.

He also reminded us that the Arabs in this Land are deeply fragmented – maybe even more than the Jews. Nonetheless, RAM’s decision to join the Israeli government has substantial popular support.

So, Mansour Abbas’s line is: I have my views, but I am prepared to accept that you don’t share them. And religion just might be a bridge for everyday coexistence where secularism has failed.

He acknowledges that Israelis distrust and suspect him of ulterior motives. Abbas said we all have multiple, maybe even contradictory, identities. He explained that he expresses his loyalty to Israel simply by participating in the system and swearing allegiance to the Knesset and state.

To my mind, this is a big deal. Consider that here in Jerusalem most Palestinian Arabs, 40 percent of the population at least, refuse to vote in municipal elections. So they do not have any representation on the city council. They reject the existence of Israel and its control over the city. In the past municipal election, one Arab slate bucked this trend to compete but Jerusalem Arabs obstinately did not go to the polls.

So I am pleased to take allegiance where I can get it.

Mansour Abbas is also a sociological ambassador – both ways. He instructs Arabs who want to figure out Jewish politics to factor in Jewish existential fears. Unlike PLO and Hamas leaders, Abbas is no Holocaust denier.

Most importantly, his recurrent theme is there is no point in emphasizing our very real – I would add zero-sum – differences since doing so leads to a dead end. His constituents want real services and tangible results. That requires engaging in politics, which necessarily involves compromise.

Speaking of tolerance, as deputy Knesset speaker, Abbas says he has been shocked by the lack of civility – especially between Jewish members. Anyone who watches Channel 99 (Israel’s C-SPAN) knows precisely what he means. 

On a personal level, Abbas is dismayed at being denounced by ultra-right Jews as a Hamasnik and by the anti-Zionist firebrands such as Ayman Odeh (a supposed progressive) and the aforementioned Ahmad Tibi (a nationalist) as a collaborator.

He says we are all changing and evolving.

He even wants Jewish votes if he can get them. The audience at HU was mostly Jewish even though there are loads of Arab students on campus.

I can’t help but think of Abbas in the context of Palestinian Arab history. In the 1930s and 1940s, some Arab clans and leaders grudgingly accepted the Zionist enterprise as an unhappy fait accompli. They thought it best for their people to cooperate, to be practical. They were all silenced or murdered. So when people ask where the Arab moderates are, the answer is – in the cemeteries. See https://www.amazon.com/Army-Shadows-Hillel-Cohen/dp/0520259890   

Abbas’s line also recalled somewhat of the West Bank Village Leagues leaders Menachem Begin sought to cultivate https://www.memri.org/reports/story-palestinian-village-leagues  They might have delivered autonomy to West Bank Arabs had the PLO not bullied them out of existence.

So in a sense, Abbas may just be the inheritor of a Palestinian Arab stream of realpolitik presumed extinct. He is not abandoning any aspect of his identity or political, religious, or cultural beliefs and demands but is open to compartmentalizing them, willing to be nuanced. Ready to find workarounds.

He told us what we already knew: that Netanyahu begged him to throw his support to him and Likud and he would have wanted to, but the ultra-right blocked Netanyahu, and moreover Abu Yair lost all credibility – so Abbas took his chances with Naftali Bennett.

On a human level, Abbas presents as respectful and warm exhibiting a winning self-deprecating humor.

May Allah continue to guide him on the path of coexistence and tolerance and keep him safe.

 

 FOR MORE ON ABBAS see

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mansour_Abbas